Search for: "Does 1-450" Results 1 - 20 of 877
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2009, 6:46 am
Hawaiian Gardens Casino, the Second District Court of Appeal on January 22, 2009, held: (1) Labor Code section 351 does not prohibit tip pooling in casinos; and (2) Although sections 351 and 450 contain no private right of action, they do serve as predicates for actions under the Unfair Competition Law. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981) apply on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:06 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States, 450 U.S. 544 (1981) apply on tribal land, as this Court suggested in Nevada v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 8:58 am by Bruce Carton
Here are today's three burning legal questions, along with the answers provided by the blogosphere. 1) Question: That does it. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:56 pm by Anthony Zaller
  This Friday’s Five discusses five key aspects California employers must understand about the new obligations created by AB 450. 1. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:56 pm by Anthony Zaller
  This Friday’s Five discusses five key aspects California employers must understand about the new obligations created by AB 450. 1. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 11:47 am by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
” Providing the “courtesy” of notice to employees does not thwart federal immigration goals. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 2:14 pm by Anthony Zaller
  This Friday’s Five discusses five issues employers need to understand about the obligations created by AB 450. 1. [read post]
9 May 2013, 7:30 am by Taryn Rucinski
Together, NNSA and EM have outlined plans that could commit American taxpayers to $450 billion in programs and projects over decades to address their missions. [read post]
20 May 2013, 4:41 am
No. 1 of Towns of Brookhaven & Smithtown, 46 NY2d 450, motion to reargue denied 46 NY2d 1076, cert denied 444 US 845, "[a] person's resignation may not be considered to be obtained under duress unless the employer threatened to take action which it had no right to take. [read post]